|
Meeting
Minutes
NEW
HOPE BOROUGH COUNCIL
180 West Bridge Street
Regular Meeting
March 14, 2007
MINUTES
PRESENT: Richard Hirschfield, Sharyn Keiser, Ed Duffy, Geri
Delevich, Claire Shaw, Rey Velasco, Randall Flager, Mayor
Laurence Keller, Borough Manager John Burke, Borough Solicitor
T. J. Walsh, Borough Engineer Craig Kennard and Chief Pasqualini.
ABSENT
MAYOR’S
REPORT
Mayor Keller announced the presentation of a 20-year service
award to Corporal Mathew Zimmerman. Corporal Zimmerman was
absent this evening due to illness.
Mayor Keller announced that there was no one in the audience
to speak on behalf of the New Hope Celebrates Parade and
suggested tabling this matter until the later part of the
meeting.
Richard Hirschfield announced that there was no Executive
Session held before the meeting tonight.
Richard Hirschfield congratulated T. J. Walsh on becoming
a new father, a little boy.
Richard Hirschfield announced that the consent agenda has
been modified. Item 4, D (2) has been moved to the first
item under 6 as requested by Councilwoman Delevich.
Richard Hirschfield congratulated Council for acquiring
the St. Martins of Tours Church on New Street, which is three
acres in the middle of the Borough that would be preserved
forever and will be used for open space, parking, and Borough
activities. The agreement of sale has been signed, and the
Borough will be closing sometime this summer.
Richard
Hirschfield announced that the discussion on the Lomas
Zoning Hearing
Board application for the Cinnabon on
West Bridge Street would be moved to after the President’s
Report.
Richard
Hirschfield explained the Cinnabon and the Dunkin’ Donuts
applications. The Cinnabon application at 36 West Bridge
Street would require a variance from the Zoning Hearing Board
because it is not a permitted use at that location. The Dunkin’ Donuts/Baskin
Robbins’ conditional use application at 2 West Bridge
Street is not on the agenda tonight and is a whole separate
issue that will be on the agenda in April or May. This is
a conditional use, which means that it is a permitted use
in that district at that location. All restaurant applications
must be treated the same by law. Council will make a decision
at the time of the hearing.
Richard
Hirschfield announced that the request to appoint Mr. Joe
Knox as an
alternate to the Zoning Hearing Board
couldn’t be addressed because he holds an elected position
as constable of New Hope. Pennsylvania law precludes Mr.
Knox from serving on the Zoning Hearing Board.
Richard Hirschfield asked for a motion to appoint Joel Roberts
of 10 West Mechanic Street as an alternate member of the
Zoning Hearing Board. Randy Flager moved to appoint Joel
Roberts, and Geri Delevich seconded. Richard Hirschfield
asked for comment by Council and the public. The motion passed
unanimously.
Richard Hirschfield announced a Proclamation to be presented
to Spencer Saunders honoring his 10 years of service to New
Hope Borough as a member and Chairperson of the Historic
Architectural Review Board. The proclamation was approved
by acclamation.
Richard Hirschfield asked Council to act on a recommendation
by Spencer Saunders to consider appointing James Rivera,
a designer and a builder, to HARB. Randy Flager moved to
appoint James Rivera, and Sharyn Keiser seconded. Richard
Hirschfield asked for comment by Council and the public.
Joe Balderston asked if James Rivera lives in the Borough.
Richard Hirschfield answered yes he does.
The motion passed unanimously.
Richard Hirschfield announced a public hearing date of May
9, 2007 for Council to consider adoption of an ordinance
prohibiting smoking at bars and restaurants in the Borough.
Mr. Hirschfield stated that smoking is a public health issue
and announced that the proposed ordinance is available at
Borough Hall for review.
Richard
Hirschfield introduced Mike Amery and explained that Mr.
Amery is seeking
Council’s support for a public-private
plan to restore the canal in the area surrounding Odette’s
Mike
Amery commented the project will cost approximately three
to five million,
and the restoration would restore
the canal to pre-flood condition near Odette’s. Mr.
Amery explained that this area is the Gateway to New Hope
and that the canal is a National Historic Landmark.
Dee Dee Bowman, Chairperson of the Revitalization Committee,
commented that the Revitalization Committee recently vote
unanimously to recommend Council support for this restoration
effort along the canal in that area. The objectives are to
bring tourists to the area and to improve the attractiveness
of the Borough.
Mike Amery stated that he would like to create more places
for recreation for residents along the river.
Richard
Hirschfield stated that this action by Council would have
nothing to
do with Council support for any future land
development plan submitted by Mr. Amery. This matter concerns
the public lands surrounding Odette’s only.
Randy Flager asked what would prevent a future flood from
destroying the proposed improvements.
Mr. Amery stated that the improvements could be designed
and constructed to current engineering standards and practices
to limit damage.
Randy Flager moved to approve a letter of support from the
Borough to the Secretary of Pa DCNR for the restoration plan,
and Sharyn Keiser seconded.
Richard Hirschfield asked for comment by Council and the
public.
Geri Delevich commented that she is very pleased with the
enthusiasm that Mr. Amery has for this project.
The motion passed unanimously.
Richard Hirschfield announced that item 6 E is next on the
agenda for discussion. This is a request by Mr. Ben Lomas
in the form of an appeal before the Zoning Hearing Board
to seek a use variance for a Cinnabon retail franchise to
be located at 36 West Bridge Street in the LC District, just
west of the railroad tracks on the north side of the street.
Council reviews all requests to the Zoning Hearing Board
and determines whether the Borough will send the Solicitor
to oppose or support the application, with the Zoning Hearing
Board having the final determination.
Richard Hirschfield asked Mr. Lomas what hardship, if any,
does he have to justify a use variance.
Mr. Lomas answered that he does not have a hardship; he
just feels that it would be good for the area to have a Cinnabon
at that location.
Richard Hirschfield asked for a motion to oppose the application
by sending the Borough solicitor to the Zoning Hearing Board
meeting.
Sharyn Keiser moved to send the Borough Solicitor to oppose
the Cinnabon application, and Ed Duffy seconded.
Richard Hirschfield asked for comment by Council and the
public.
Elaine Mc Nealy asked Council to oppose this variance. Ms.
Nealy stated that one chain store leads to another, and that
Cinnabon does not fit New Hope.
Richard
Hirschfield commented that this application is about whether
the use
is permitted in this District, and it is
not. Council’s vote would be conditioned on the lack
of a demonstrable hardship in this case. Council cannot oppose
chains and franchises because that is against the law.
Sharyn Keiser commented that Council is also trying to protect
the integrity of the Borough.
Bob Gerenser commented that Mr. Lomas should review the
history of this property because others have tried and failed
to obtain variances for similar uses.
Joe Balderston asked if the newly written Zoning Ordinance
recognizes that these types of uses are not good for the
Borough.
Richard Hirschfield responded that this area was rezoned
as part of the November 2006 Zoning Ordinance. The issue
is permitted uses and Council cannot pick and choose, without
excluding the use entirely.
Brian
Montgomery, 82 S. Main Street, asked if it would be ok
to put a McDonalds
in the place of Spatola’s pizza?
Richard Hirschfield stated that it would have to meet the
requirements and the conditions set forth by the Borough
in its Zoning Ordinance, and that it is not permissible under
Pennsylvania law to distinguish between restaurants.
Carl Christenson, owner of Integrity Studio, commented that
he is concerned about the Cinnabon application because of
the infrastructure of the small parking lot and access way
and their use by BCWSA, Verizon, and other tenants.
The motion passed unanimously.
Richard Hirschfield announced that the consent agenda is
next and asked for a motion to approve the consent agenda
for items 4, A through D with the exception of item 4, D
(2) as follows.
4. Consent Agenda.
A. Consideration of approving payment of accounts payable
for March 14, 2007, in the amount of $99,101.73; of payroll
for February 14, 2007 in the amount of $49,611.55; and
of payroll for February 28, 2007 in the amount of $63,706.55.
B. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2007-08R, establishing a land use and
zoning fee schedule.
C. Consideration of adopting Resolution No. 23007-09R, authorizing the Borough
Treasurer to close an account at Wachovia Securities.
D. Consideration of issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness, as recommended
by the Historic Architectural Review Board, for:
(1) 48 West Bridge Street, by Dan Leuzzi, for a new railing installation;
(2) Canal Street Development, by George Michael, for sidewalk, brick material,
and street lights;
(3) 52 North Main Street, by Mr. & Mrs. Axel Olson, for a change from a
2-story addition to a 1-story addition; and
(4) 11 Chestnut Street, by the Estate of John Galloway, for construction of
a single-family dwelling unit.
Claire Shaw moved to approve the consent agenda, with the
exception of item 4, D (2), and Randy Flager seconded. Richard
Hirschfield asked for comment by Council and the public.
The motion passed unanimously.
MANAGER’S
REPORT
John
Burke announced a public hearing for consideration of adopting
Ordinance
No. 2007-03, approving a cable television
franchise agreement with Verizon. This will allow a non-exclusive
12-year franchise with Verizon, which will have the right
to own, construct, operate and maintain a cable system. In
exchange, Verizon will provide cable services along the public
rights-of-way within the Borough and agree to recognize the
Borough’s responsibility to protect and manage its
public rights-of-way. Verizon also agrees to provide high
standards of customer service and financial compensation
for the use of the public rights-of-way and complimentary
basic cable service for certain public buildings, as well
as educational and governmental channels to benefit the entire
community.
Richard Hirschfield commented that Verizon may provide the
service within 10 years and asked for a motion to approve
this ordinance.
Mary
Lou Frere of Verizon stated that Verizon would provide
service in
a “substantial way” within 5 years.
Geri Delevich moved to approve Ordinance No. 2007-03 and
the franchise agreement, and Sharyn Keiser seconded.
Richard Hirschfield asked for comment by Council and the
public.
Joel Roberts of 10 West Mechanic Street asked if there is
anything in the contracts with these cable companies to clean
up the existing cables that are hanging all over the place.
Richard Hirschfield commented that Comcast is responsible
for existing cable lines and stated that the Borough would
look into this matter.
The motion passed unanimously
John Burke asked for consideration of selecting a bond counsel.
The Borough has received 6 proposals from bond firms, in
response to an RFP issued by the Borough. The proposals range
from $14,900.00 to $35,000, and the work involves interim
financing for the acquisition of the church property on New
Street and permanent financing in the form of a bond issue
for acquisition and improvements to that property. The low
bid is Rhoads and Simon, a law firm out of Harrisburg, PA
at $14, 900.00.
John Burke commented that the Borough would need the acquisition
money by the end of June.
Richard Hirschfield asked for a motion to hire Rhoads and
Simon as bond counsel.
Claire Shaw moved to approve Rhoads and Simon as bond counsel,
and Randy Flager seconded.
Randy Flager thanked John and Council and commended the
choice and cost, which he feels, is a tremendous savings
to the taxpayers, coming in at less than half of the high
bid. Mr. Flager stated that he is grateful that the Borough
chose to bid this service.
Richard Hirschfield asked for comment by Council and the
public.
The motion passed unanimously.
Ed Duffy announced consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness,
as recommended by HARB, for Canal Street and submitted by
Paul Michael, for sidewalk, brick material, and streetlights.
Ed Duffy commented that it would be a good idea to see if
the streetlights in the presentation this evening could be
adopted in all of New Hope and be used throughout the Borough.
Mr. Duffy also added that special attention should be given
to the bricks at the entrance to the project so that they
are consistent with what is used town already.
Paul
Michael stated that the streetlights would be low-level
fixtures, the
same as those located at the Visitors’ Center
and in Doylestown Borough.
Mayor Keller asked if a ladder bar could be added to the
poles in keeping with what was used years ago. This is useful
for hanging baskets.
Paul Michael stated that his company would be using dark
red natural clay brick pavers that have a distressed, irregular
appearance. They will be installed from the canal bridge
up to the Stockton Bridge on the north side of West Mechanic
Street. Grey pavers will be used at the crosswalk.
Council members commented that they liked the idea that
the appearance is not uniform and that different colors would
be used.
Ed Duffy moved to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness
for the Canal Street Development streetscape, and Rey Velasco
seconded. Richard Hirschfield asked for comment by Council
and the public.
Joe Balderston asked if the pavers would feature a pattern.
Paul Michael stated that he would look into this.
Joel Roberts asked how the pavers would be installed.
Paul Michael stated that the pavers would be installed in
a modified stone base.
The motion passed unanimously.
Ed Duffy announced the next item on the agenda is consideration
of issuing a Certificate of Appropriateness for New Canal
Village, submitted by Ed McGahan and located on the east
side of New Street in the Historic District.
Mike Carr, Esq., from Eastburn and Gray was present to represent
Ed McGahan.
Andre
D’Allessia,
a contractor for Ed McGahan, came forward to discuss the
materials as follows:
- The
buildings will be fieldstone.
- Roofs
will be simulated slate.
- Solid
copper snow guards and copper dormers will be used.
- All
fireplaces will be solid masonry with authentic one-piece
stone caps.
- All
windows will be Colby and Colby.
- The front retaining wall will be double-faced and
natural stone.
- All iron gates will be solid and painted
black.
- All paving will be blue stone.
- Shutters will be wood with iron hardware.
- All natural stone will be used.
Richard
Hirschfield commented that Council plans to amend the HARB
ordinance
in April to state that structures cannot
be 10% higher than the structures located on adjacent properties.
The current ordinance does not provide a clear or precise
definition of the work “adjacent.” The real purpose
of HARB is to protect the streetscape. The HARB amendment
would only allow consideration of properties that are on
the same side of the street in the Historic District. This
amendment will not allow comparisons across rights-of-way
or roads.
Richard Hirschfield commented that the question at this
point is whether Council likes the plan and wants to award
a Certificate of Appropriateness or whether Council has an
option other than the 10% rule in the current HARB ordinance.
T. J. Walsh commented that in this case a judge would be
called upon to resolve a dispute that is not about the letter
of what the ordinance says but about whose interpretation
makes more sense. When you are litigating a matter of interpretation,
the judge will decide based upon what is the most favorable
land use to the property owner.
Randy Flager commented that the proposed construction standards
are excellent and that, unfortunately, the neighbors supported
the setback relief sought by the applicant before the Zoning
Hearing Board that enabled the developer to construct taller,
more substantial structures. Mr. Flager stated that he is
concerned with the height of the buildings.
Mike Carr stated that his client has supplied information
on properties on New Street and, with the exception of the
two side-by-side properties, the proposed buildings are consistent
with the streetscape. There has been no attempt to mislead.
Claire Shaw expressed disappointment that the applicant,
who was asked at the February meeting, did not come in with
a site elevation plan to show a comparison of the size of
the proposed buildings to the surrounding homes.
Geri Delevich stated that she appreciates the use of natural
materials, but stated that the project may be a bit overwhelming
in scale.
Tom Smyth commented that he has attended all HARB meetings
for this project and talked about height and streetscape
issues from the beginning and feels like the street has been
failed.
Richard Hirschfield commented that Council really tried
to research the issue but the result was as T.J. mentioned
is the best interpretation for the landowner.
Ed Hild, 92 Towpath, stated that the neighbors have been
taken advantage of and failed and that the backs of the proposed
buildings are way out of scale. Mr. Hild suggested that landscaping
be used to soften the back of the project and to blend it
in to its surroundings.
Sharyn Keiser did not understand how the residents felt
that the Borough boards and committees failed the neighbors
to this project. Ms. Keiser stated that the New Street residents
supported the variances granted by the Zoning Hearing Board
for this project and that Council did not oppose because
the neighbors supported the variances.
Dee Dee Bowman commented that the New Street residents did
support the applicant at the Zoning Hearing Board meeting
because bringing the houses closer to the street would be
more in scale and keeping with the character of the neighborhood.
Also, the residents said that the whole project had to be
in scale, and the feeling is that HARB never addressed the
issue of scale.
Iain
Haight-Ashton, a member of HARB, commented that he was
told that height
was not a part of HARB’s jurisdiction.
Richard Hirschfield commented that HARB is responsible for
the aesthetics, harmony and continuity of a project, not
size.
Craig Kennard commented that the Zoning Hearing Board based
its decision on the testimony of the neighbors.
Ed Duffy moved to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness
for New Canal Village, and Rey Velasco seconded. The motion
passed by the following vote: 4-3
HIRSCHFIELD |
KEISER |
DUFFY |
VALASCO |
SHAW |
DELEVICH |
FLAGER |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
N |
Ed Duffy announced the next item on the agenda for consideration
is a preliminary plan of land development, submitted by Ed
McGahan, for New Canal Village.
Mike Carr announced that he is present to represent Mr.
McGahan.
Richard Hirschfield asked Mike Carr to address the proposed
waivers sought by the applicant as follows.
1. Section
4.02.C.2 – To allow plan scales less than
1” = 50’ or 1” = 100’, to the satisfaction
of the Borough Engineer.
2. Section
5.04.E – To
not require a 30-foot wide drainage easement to preserve
the natural drainage along
the Delaware Canal.
3. Sections
5.05.C.1 & 5.07.A.4 – To not require
a minimum 20-foot wide drainage easement for all on-site
storm sewer facilities for maintenance since the Condominium
Association will maintain the on-site storm sewer facilities.
4. Section
5.06.D.2 – To
not require proposed grading to be a minimum of 5 feet
from a property line to avoid encroachment
of the abutting properties during construction.
5. Section
5.09.C – To
reduce the required road widening from a minimum cart way
width of 36 feet for New Street,
conditioned upon payment of a cash contribution of $20,000.00
in lieu of improving the last 20 ft. of New Street at the
northern end of the site due to steep slopes and the proximity
of the proposed structure location to the street and completion
of all road improvements to the satisfaction of the Borough
Engineer.
6. Section
5.17.G – To
allow driveway grades ranging between 4% and 10%, instead
of the maximum 5% permitted by
ordinance.
7. Sections
5.10, C & 5.17 – To allow one stacked
spillover parking space, measuring 8 ft. by 18 ft., at the
rear of each structure (by reducing the length of the garage
by 2 ft.), instead of in a driveway or turn-around.
Richard Hirschfield asked the Borough Engineer to comment
on the proposed waivers.
Craig Kennard commented that he supports the waivers for
plan scale, the drainage easement along the canal, the drainage
easement for on-site storm water facilities, the grading
within five feet of the property line, and the spillover
parking. The waiver that has been difficult to resolve from
an engineering perspective is the driveway slope. Because
the garages are rear access, the driveway slope is greater
than what the ordinance permits. A new set of plans shows
a slope of less than 10%. In his October 13, 2006 letter,
he referenced grades of greater than 10% and stated that
he did not support this. The Fire Marshall said that the
fire company would not be accessing the backs of the units
and would access from the front of the street only. The waiver
regarding slope is directly related to the Zoning Hearing
Board decision.
Richard Hirschfield asked what the alternative is.
Craig Kennard answered that the alternative would be front-loaded
garages to comply with the ordinance.
Richard Hirschfield asked what the right-of-way improvement
issue involves.
Craig Kennard answered that there would be improvements
along New Street by widening the road and adding new curb
and sidewalk to enhance the front area and stated that he
supported a partial waiver of the widening in exchange for
a capital contribution of $20,000.00.
Mike
Carr commented that there are issues that do not appear
in the review
letter that have to do with the Department
of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR). The applicant
received guidance from DCNR to stabilize the embankment to
allow the applicant to work on the canal property and to
restore it to DCNR’s standards. The applicant will
need a temporary construction easement for that. DCNR has
also asserted that the location of the property boundary
is a little bit farther from the edge of the water based
on their deed. This issue was discussed with Borough staff,
and it was agreed that there would be plan notes added to
that effect.
Mike Carr asked Council to consider final approval if the
Borough Engineer and the Zoning Officer are satisfied with
the plans.
Ed Duffy asked what are they are doing to the canal side
of the property?
Mike CARR answered the plan shows a driveway that slopes
down the southerly end of the property and wraps around the
back and is supported by a retaining wall that is not very
tall that runs along the edge of the driveway.
Richard Hirschfield asked for a motion.
Ed Duffy
moved to approve a preliminary/final plan of land development
subject to the applicant’s agreement with
the conditions of plan approval recommended by the Borough
Manager, and Rey Velasco seconded.
Richard
Hirschfield asked the applicant if he accepts all terms
of the Manager’s
draft letter of February 15, 2007.
Mike Carr answered yes.
The motion passed 6-1 by the following vote:
HIRSCHFIELD
|
KEISER
|
DELEVICH
|
VALASCO
|
SHAW
|
DUFFY
|
FLAGER
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
N
|
Y
|
Y
|
Mike Carr presented a preliminary/final plan of minor subdivision
and lot line adjustment, submitted by Robert J, Cwenar, Jr.
This plan involves the creation of two lots from three current
lots and the construction of a second dwelling unit. A separate
application is scheduled to go before the Zoning Hearing
Board.
Mr. Carr stated the land currently consists of three separate
parcels located on the west side of New Street, south of
the recent George Michael development. The applicant proposes
to merge three lots into two lots, remove a garage structure,
and build a new dwelling unit. The lots have been merged
and used as one lot in the past.
Richard Hirschfield commented that the Zoning Hearing Board
should decide this case and that Council should take no position.
Ed Duffy agreed.
Claire Shaw moved to send the Borough Solicitor to oppose
this application.
Richard Hirschfield stated that Council should make a distinction
between important and unimportant cases and not oppose every
variance request.
Rey Velasco commented that the Zoning Hearing Board should
handle this case.
Richard Hirschfield asked for a second to the motion.
Sharyn Keiser seconded the motion.
Sharyn Keiser commented that New Street has gone through
a lot of development projects in recent years that have greatly
affected that street and is concerned about this project
where variances may be requested for yards, lot area, and
impervious surface.
Mike
Carr stated that his client is willing to reduce the list
of variances
to one—for lot size only—and
is also willing to limit the size of the proposed dwelling
unit to two stories.
Richard Hirschfield asked it the applicant would commit
to seeking a variance for lot size only and agree to return
to Council if additional variances are sought before appearing
before the Zoning Hearing Board.
Geri
Delevich stated that New Hope is being “overbuilt” and
agreed with Claire Shaw that Council should oppose this application.
Richard Hirschfield at this time called the question to oppose
this application and send the Borough Solicitor to represent
the Borough.
The motion was denied by the following vote.
SHAW
|
DELEVICH
|
DUFFY
|
KEISER
|
HIRSCHFIELD
|
VELASCO
|
FLAGER
|
Y
|
Y
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
Richard Hirschfield announced the next item on the agenda
is a presentation by Thom Smyth and a discussion of a plan
to establish a cooking school at 85 West Bridge Street. Mr.
Hirschfield also added that Mr. Smith has done a beautiful
job renovating the house.
Thom Smith is a chef and teacher by profession. Mr. Smith
would like to open a cooking school at this location, but
it is not a permitted use. The hardships here are that it
would be a difficult property to sell partly because it has
been hit so many times by vehicles and the economic return
may not be sufficient because of the extraordinary costs
of renovation. The use Mr. Smith proposes is a minimum use.
The Zoning Hearing Board could determine the days of operation
and the hours would be reasonable, ending probably not later
than 9 P.M. Mr. Smith sent correspondence to all the neighbors
and had discussions with the Fire Marshal and the Department
of Health and is awaiting the outcome of those conversations
to see if this idea is feasible.
Richard Hirschfield stated that he supports the cooking
school as long as Mr. Smith follows the restrictions approved
by the Zoning Hearing Board. It will be important to maintain
the residential character of the neighborhood.
Mr. Smith agreed and added that he is trying to work out
an agreement with George Michael to have his customers park
at Union Square.
Richard Hirschfield commented that Mr. Smith would need
to comply with the noise ordnance.
Rey Velasco commented that he does not have a problem with
classical music.
Ed Duffy asked about the cooking equipment and the output.
Tom Smith answered that he must use commercial equipment.
Mr. Smith added that he has to observe the same requirements
as a restaurant.
Sharyn Keiser asked about trash.
Tom Smith answered that it would be no more than residential
and that he would build an enclosed area.
Geri Delevich asked the Solicitor what could happen if Tom
sells the property after getting the variance.
T. J.
Walsh stated that a variance couldn’t be personalized.
Tom Smith answered that the variance could be restricted
to a cooking school only and that he would agree to a variance
for an educational institute for teaching cooking.
John Burke asked if Mr. Smyth has any plans to offer catering
services from this location.
Mr. Smyth replied that he has no plans for catering.
Richard Hirschfield asked if the premises would be sprinklered.
Thom Smyth replied that he would install a monitored hardwired
detection system.
Geri
Delevich stated that cooking is an art and that this is
a “palatable” variance
request.
Richard Hirschfield asked Mr. Smyth to return to Council
for discussion after the application to the Zoning Hearing
Board is filed.
Richard Hirschfield left the room at this time.
T. J. Walsh asked for consideration of approving a written
decision in the conditional use application of Marsha Brown
for expansion of the restaurant use at 15 South Main Street.
Randy Flager moved to approve the written decision, and
Rey Velasco Seconded.
Sharyn Keiser called the motion.
The motion passed 6-0 by the following vote;
HIRSHFIELD
|
KEISER
|
DUFFY
|
SHAW
|
VELASCO
|
FLAGER
|
DELEVICH
|
absent
for vote
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
RECREATION AND REVITALIZATION REPORT
Sharyn Keiser stated that the plans for Lenape Park and
Canal Walk are moving along.
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS REPORT
Rey Velasco
announced the New Hope Visitor’s Center
statistics for February 2006 and 2007 as follows:
| STATISTICS |
2006 |
2007 |
| Visitors |
1,189 |
924 |
| Calls |
245 |
247 |
| Brochures |
13 |
28 |
| Sales |
435.00 |
$58.80 |
| Donations |
$133.27 |
$235.36 |
Rey reminded everyone that there was no Winterfest this
year.
Rey Velasco announced that there is a meeting tomorrow at
3:15 P.M. and 7:00 P.M. at 2 Stockton Avenue for New Hope
Arts for those interested in attending.
Rey Velasco announced April 1, 2007 as the date for the
Bird House Auction by New Hope Arts.
Rey Velasco announced that the date of the Sculpture Show
is April 28, 2007 and they are looking for volunteers at
2 Stockton Avenue.
Rey Velasco
announced that the Showcase of the Arts will be held July
13 – 15th,
2007.
Geri Delevich announced that F.A.C.T. bingo would be held
on Tuesday March 20, 2007 at 7:00 P.M.
Richard Hirschfield returned to the meeting.
Geri Delevich wished John Larason a happy 80th birthday.
Geri Delevich announced that the New Hope Garden Club would
be doing the annual spring planting on March 31st, at 10:00
A.M., if you are meeting at the Living Earth, and at 10:20
A.M. if you wish to join at Stockton Avenue.
Geri
Delevich announced the New Hope Solebury high school musical
this
Thursday–Sunday.
Geri Delevich asked Dan Brooks to come forward to present
Somewhere Over The Rainbow events.
Dan Brooks announced that the Gay Pride Festival would be
held May 18-20th. There will be many events including a parade.
This event also promotes New Hope and generated $500,000
for New Hope businesses last year. Mr. Brook asked Council
if the parade could leave from the Legion, go down New Street
north to Stockton and east on Ferry into the park. Mr. Brooks
also presented an optional route for the parade.
Richard Hirschfield asked for a motion to approve the parade
conditioned upon all Borough requirements being met, including
reimbursement of police overtime.
Randy Flager moved to approve the parade, and Sharyn Keiser
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Dan Brooks asked for permission to hang a banner on the
Starbucks building advertising the festival.
Council approved the banner by acclamation.
Sharyn Keiser announced that Steve Stahl has a new play
at the Abington Theater Arts Complex in New York from March
13-26th and congratulated his success.
Geri Delevich asked about the dead fish in the canal.
John Burke answered that DCNR has promised to clean it up.
Dee Dee Bowman asked if the Borough intends to preserve
the open space at 111 New Street.
Richard
Hirschfield answered that it is the Borough’s
objective to keep it open space.
Joe Balderston asked about the status of water hook-ups.
John Burke answered that the Authority has assured the Borough
that property owners will be allowed to connect in April.
Bob Gerenser stated that in June 1778 the entire army of
General George Washington broke camp in Valley Forge and
marched down Ferry Street in New Hope on its way to defeat
General Cornwallis at Monmouth. Mr. Gerenser stated that
Washington had placed two artillery batteries at the church
location on New Street
ADJOURNMENT
|